Silent decision … The American embassy in Jerusalem is dwarfing into an audience segment
In a silent, but very significant step, the American embassy in Jerusalem changed the name & quot; Palestinian Affairs Office & quot; To & quot; the Palestinian public office & quot; it appears to be a deliberate reformulation of the nature of the relationship with the Palestinians. It is linked to internationally recognized political and legal rights, to the classification of Palestinians as & quot & quot; He receives public services or activities, just as countries deal with their cultural or media programs within local groups without a sovereign characteristic. It is & ndash; In essence & ndash; A gradual dwarf of Palestine as a issue and as a political entity to a mere category targeted with public relations services, in a disturbing harmony with the Israeli vision that seeks to liquidate the political dimension of the Palestinian presence, especially in Jerusalem, and turn it into an administrative and population issue only.
& nbsp;
& nbsp;"Color:#c0392b;"> What That Hate ! For Israel. Washington is not for the American ambassador to Israel.
& nbsp; That.
& nbsp; To & quot; Palestinian public office & quot; (Public Diplomacy & Ndash; Palestinian Public), in a move that raised widespread questions about its legal and political connotations, and its repercussions on Washington’s dealings with the Palestinian issue and its position in the American policy agenda, but this step may have indications and indicators on the political orientation of the current US administration with Palestinians. Or & quot; file & quot;, to mere & quot; audience & quot; Public activities and media and cultural services are directed to him. And & quot; the Palestinian public & quot;? & bull; The Palestinian Affairs Office: The Palestinian Public Public Office: The new name turns the task to a distance & quot; general diplomat & quot; deals with the public as a public population category, and avoids dealing with political or human rights issues, which is considered an implicit dispute of political recognition of the Palestinians as a negotiating party. Political and legal connotations of change
& nbsp;
& nbsp;
1. Ramzi retracted the recognition of Palestinian political representation: change indicates that Washington no longer deals with the Palestinians through & quot; case & quot; Official political list or leadership, but as & quot; audience & quot; In the context of cultural, media or service activities.
& nbsp;
2. An extension of the approach to the closure of the American consulate in East Jerusalem: Since the Trump administration’s decision in 2019 the closure of the consulate that was a direct relationship with the Palestinians, more reducing acting and communication tools is now being reduced, and reducing the political nature of dealing.
& nbsp;
& nbsp; In harmony with the Israeli vision to dwarf the Palestinian entity: the new designation is in line with the Israeli vision that refuses an independent political representation of the Palestinians in Jerusalem, and seeks to limit dealing with them as & quot; residents & quot; Without sovereign rights.
& nbsp;
& nbsp;
4. The letter is transformed from relationships to services: converting the office into a party concerned with the & quot & quot; Transforming the relationship from a political path to a public relations path, is limited to cultural, media, or educational grants, without touching on national rights or sovereignty.
& nbsp;
& nbsp;
5. The direct dependency of the foreign affairs, and the most important thing is that the subordination of the Palestinian Affairs Office was for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Washington as an independent entity, but the Palestinian public office, its followers of the American ambassador to Israel. Experts in international law and diplomatic relations believe that this change & quot; is not just an administrative amendment & quot; rather, it reflects an American direction to dismantle the official dealings with the Palestinians as an international political issue. Analysts confirm that reducing the terms with the political dimension of the diplomatic arena leaves a serious impact, because & quot; the language of institutions & quot; Gradually reshape the political reality. This amendment may be made as part of an internal administrative organization, but its political impact is more than this, which calls for an official Palestinian response and follow -up from international diplomacy to ensure that international dealings with the Palestinians do not slip towards the path of gradual marginalization.
& nbsp;
& nbsp; This shift is a reflection of a change in American priorities, or a prelude to a new stage of conflict management without a solution? Will the Palestinian Authority deal with this transformation as a transient administrative decision, or does it require a clear political position against this slide in the discourse and the situation?
- For more: Follow Khaleejion 24 Arabic, Khaleejion 24 English, Khaleejion 24 Live, and for social media follow us on Facebook and Related
