Fadlallah: Players ’dues do not fall into statute of limitations, but the conflict may be restricted

The football scene is currently witnessing a state of controversy regarding the dues of the players that fall into statute of limitations or not, which requires experts ’intervention to resolve the matter so that rights are not lost and problems and conflicts occur between the players and their clubs. It represents an important legal rule:

First: – The legal principle of statute of limitations in (FIFA) & nbsp;

& nbsp;

There is no explicit legal text in the FIFA regulations that requires players ’dues after two years, but the regulations for conflict resolution procedures (FIFA RSTP – Article 9) stipulate that ( The cases in front of the Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC) must be filed within two years of the date of the incident or the event that led to the emergence of the dispute), and then this means that if the player does not file his complaint to (FIFA) within two years from the date of the entitlement of the amount or the incident in the dispute, then (FIFA) will refuse to regard the case to consider it as a procedural brief and not that the right fell Automatic. Procedural related to the regulation of separation in disputes, not a fall for the same right. International disputes unless it was compatible with the FIFA regulations.

& nbsp; At the end of the matter, (FIFA) rejected the lawsuit not to drop the right, but rather closes a door of the claim only, and remains the right of the player to litigate before other parties such as civil courts or the International Sports Arbitration Court, according to the applicable law and the contract agreement.

• For more: Follow Khaleejion 24 Arabic, Khaleejion 24 English, Khaleejion 24 Live, and for social media follow us on Facebook and