Constitutional: tightening the traffic penalty unlike the direction if it results

The Supreme Constitutional Court ruled with its session held today, Saturday, headed by Counselor Paul Fahmy Iskandar- President of the Court, & nbsp; By rejecting the lawsuit regarding the constitutionality of the first and second paragraphs of Article (76) of the Traffic Law issued by Law No. 66 of 1973, the representative of the President of the Republic by Law No. 142 of 2014, while it included the punishment of anyone who led a vehicle reversing the direction in the highway inside or outside the cities, EGP. The verb

& nbsp;

The court emphasized that when the text appointed the pillars of the crime in a clear way that does not sparked a hiddenness about its content, and showed its previous punishment, its revenue, which are reasonable penalties and are appropriate to the crime in its place, and it is not difficult for the judicial uniqueness, as it falls between two limits below and maximum in relation to the negative punishment of freedom, as well as the permissibility of implementation The penalty for a fine. The court added that what is transferred between the judge and his authority to stop the implementation of the imprisonment penalty prescribed by the referred text is the text of Article (55) of the Penal Code -which is not presented in this lawsuit

& nbsp; For the constitution to the legislator to achieve a balance between them in the light of several considerations, topped by the gravity of the crime and the amount of its societal impact, and the feasibility of stopping its implementation in the rehabilitation of the convicted person to H.

• For more: Follow Khaleejion 24 Arabic, Khaleejion 24 English, Khaleejion 24 Live, and for social media follow us on Facebook and