300 thousand dirhams in compensation for a runaway victim of “permanent disability”

The Al -Ain Court for Civil, Commercial and Administrative Cofteers ruled that the owner of a vehicle would lead to a young man of 300,000 dirhams, in compensation for his goal, and caused him to suffer permanent disability.

In the details, a young man filed a lawsuit against another, in which he demanded that he be obligated to pay him an amount of 400 thousand dirhams, in order to compensate for the material and literary damage he had, and to compel him to fees, expenses of the lawsuit and law fees, indicating that the defendant caused his mistake to prejudice the safety of his body, after he led his vehicle without adhering to the captivity, and resulted in this injury. He was grossly convicted, and the ruling became firm and final.

The defendant submitted an answer note, which included the request to enter the insurance company and compel it with what the court rules, according to what is fixed in the insurance policy, while the present submitted the opponent of the opponent an answer note to the entry newspaper, which was paid at the end of not accepting the lawsuit, to file it without the path that the law drew.

For its part, the court clarified that the request to enter the insurance company requires, in accordance with the law, to resort to the committees established by Law No. (3) for the year 2018, and it was entrusted with the settlement of disputes arising from contracts and work services, and it has the authority to request any document or documents, and the use of people of experience or hearing witnesses, and any other alternatives that require the use of them to settle disputes presented to them before resorting to the competent court, and the defendant was the defendant It may be submitted by an entry request without submitting what is useful for resorting to the committee formed in Article 110 of the aforementioned law.

On the subject of the case, the court indicated that according to the Civil Transactions Law, “all harm to others is necessary, even if not distinguished, by guaranteeing the damage,” noting that the constant from reading the papers and its documents is that the defendant was criminally convicted of the charge of causing his mistake in violating the integrity of the victim’s body (the plaintiff) that he led the vehicle on the road without making maximum care, The victim, and this criminal judiciary has been separated in the common basis between the civil and criminal lawsuits, and in the legal description of it and its attribution to his perpetrator.

Regarding the compensation, the court stated that the constant from reading the papers and from the report of the expert (the pathologist) delegated in the case, which the court reassured, has ended to the conclusion that the prosecutor’s injury was settled and became of the nature of a final recipe, and the overall injuries may have been a permanent disability estimated at 45% of its total public powers, and the court ruled that the request to enter the insurance company is not accepted. Without the road that the law drew, obligating the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of 300 thousand dirhams, according to the reasons, and also obligated him to fees and expenses of the case.

. The court demonstrated that the total injuries of the plaintiff left a permanent disability, estimated at 45% of his total public powers.