Reports

Season messages on “social media” cost a woman 30 thousand dirhams

The Abu Dhabi Family and Civil and Administrative Courts ruled that a defendant compensate for a woman for 30 thousand dirhams, after she directed her to insults through one of the social media applications, and also obligated her to fees and expenses.

In the details, the victim filed a lawsuit in which she stated that “the defendant insulted her using a social media program, by writing and comments on pictures and videos, and sending phrases on the private, and after that a criminal lawsuit was moved and a ruling was issued,” noting that her act caused harm to it morally and financially, which led her to file this lawsuit.

In her claim, she called for the defendant to compel the defendant for 150 thousand dirhams, in order to compensate for the material, literary and psychological damage that she was caused by the act of the defendant, and to compel her to expenses and judicial fees, and in exchange for attorney fees.

In the reasons for its ruling, the court emphasized that «the collection of understanding the reality in the case, appreciating its evidence and extracting the availability of the responsibility of responsibility, and the relationship of causation between it and the damage, is from the authority of the trial court, according to what is convinced of it when its understanding, appreciation and extraction is unwilling Doing it. ”

She stated that «the constant is one of the criminal lawsuits that the defendant insulted the victim with the words of the inspected insults in the record, and this was using a means of information technology, as shown in the papers.

The court stated that it is stable in the judiciary of this court, that it is the literary damage that does not affect the person in his money, and it can be returned to certain conditions, and there is literary harm that affects the body as a result of the pain that results from the cases that it suffers, and a literary harm that affects honor, presentation and consideration, and literary damage that affects emotion and feeling, and literary harm that affects the person from merely assaulting a fixed right for him.

She pointed out that it is decided in accordance with the Civil Transactions Law, that all harm to others is obligated to the guarantee, and the defendant’s mistake (insulting) was, and the prosecutor was damaged by the moral damage (sorrow and remorse), and accordingly the court estimates the compensation that the plaintiff deserves for those damage to her in the amount of 30 thousand dirhams.

The court rejected the plaintiff’s request to compensate for material damage, as it indicated that compensation for the material damage that requires compensation, is to violate the financial interest of the victim, and that it is permissible to compensate for possible material damage when it was achieved, and there is no lawlessness without calculating them in the last gain from what the victim was hoped to obtain, as long as this first has reasonable reasons, then the papers were not He proves with him that the plaintiff is financially damaged, due to the defendant’s mistake, and these pillars have not been proven, and the court must refuse to request the financial compensation in this regard.

• The court confirmed that the defendant caused the prosecutor morally.

Related Articles

Back to top button