A fraudulent purchase of a villa that he does not own .. and gets 100 thousand dirhams

The Al -Ain Court for Civil, Commercial and Administrative Cofteers ruled that a fraudulent man would lead to a man of 100,000 dirhams, which he had seized from him by deception, after his accusation that he had a villa that he wanted to sell, as he obtained the amount in advance (deposit).

The court also obliged him to perform the plaintiff 50 thousand dirhams in compensation for the material and psychological damage that afflicted him, so that the total amount sentenced to 150 thousand dirhams.

In the details, a man filed a lawsuit against another, in which he demanded that he be returned to him an amount of 100 thousand dirhams and the compensation for the material and literary damage in the amount of 75 thousand dirhams, as well as fees and expenses and for the fees of the law, indicating that the defendant offered his villa for sale in the amount of 450 thousand dirhams, and it was agreed between them to purchase the residence at the so -called price, and he paid 100 thousand dirhams The purchase, and then discovered that the villa is not owned by the defendant, and that he was subjected to a deception.

For its part, the court clarified in the reasons for its ruling that the constant is to read the image of the ruling issued in the criminal case that the defendant was convicted of the charge of seizing himself on the amount owned by the victim (the plaintiff), by using in a fraudulent way that he deluded him to sell a villa and hand him over its keys, which led to the deception of the victim and his pregnancy on delivery, and that judiciary has become permanent A separation in the common basis between the civil and criminal lawsuits, and in the legal description of it and its attribution to its perpetrator.

The court indicated that the prosecutor reported the newspaper his claim that the defendant did not want the amount seized, and it was clear that the amounts that the defendant embezzled for himself in accordance with the criminal ruling. I was removed from the amount.

And on the request for compensation, she indicated that the defendant’s mistake is fixed, and he has resulted in material damage that represents the plaintiff’s failure to use the seized amount, and the cause of causation between the error and the damage was available, so the defendant is legally obligated to compensate him for the damage.

The court estimated the compensation due at the amount of 50 thousand dirhams, and ruled that the defendant obliges the plaintiff an amount of 150 thousand dirhams in accordance with the reasons and expenses.