He seizes 70,000 dirhams from a person in a fake investment

The Civil Court in Dubai obligated an Asian person to pay the amount of 70 thousand dirhams to an Arab person who convinced him of buying a truck and bike to deliver applications, provided that he rents them at a month Its duty to contract.

In detail, an Arab person filed a civil lawsuit, calling for Asian as a first claimant and the company he owns as a second claimant to pay the amount of 91 thousand dirhams to him with legal interest, on a basis from saying that he was the first convinced him of an investment opportunity for her company that is to buy a truck and a bike.

The prosecutor said that it is a commitment to his duty in the agreement and paid the defendant 70 thousand dirhams, and the latter issued a declaration to the debt that guaranteed his commitment to pay the amount of the invested capital, pointing out that the agreement includes renting the truck and the delivery bike by one of the defendants’ companies in favor of the plaintiff for 3500 dirhams per month, but This was not achieved.

He added that he had contacted the defendant several times to return the amount he seized, but he was appointed to do so, which led him to file a lawsuit, and attached to her newspaper pictures of the agreement and a legal agency, a lease contract, a conversion delivery, and a declaration of debt.

In turn, the defendant did not attend or represent any party on behalf of his defendant’s company, so the court ruled an expense with an expert to hear the case.

In his report, the expert concluded that the defendant company has a limited commercial license, while the defendant is its founder and CEO, indicating that the latter agreed with the plaintiff that the latter pay 70 thousand dirhams to buy a truck and a bike recorded in the name of the company, provided that they remain owned by the defendant .

The expert explained that the defendant agreed with the plaintiff to rent the truck from him for 3500 dirhams per month for a full year, which prompted him to contract with him and transfer an amount of 70 thousand dirhams to him to invest in his company.

He pointed out that the defendant did not attend in front of the experience despite announcing the publication, and did not provide any documents stating that the amount is transferred to him, pointing out that the approval of a debt to the writer justice acknowledges that he owes the prosecutor at the amount of 70 thousand dirhams, and undertakes to return it completely without any delay.

Regarding the investment return account, the expert stated that the agreed upon between the two parties according to the agency’s contract and the rent committed the defendant to pay the return on investment in monthly payments over a year with a total of 42 thousand dirhams, but the case papers were free, which benefits the purchase of the truck and the agreed bike or investing the amount in the first place.

For its part, the court stated in its ruling that it reassures the validity of the result that the expert ended up with, because it was based on sound material research, and its agreement with the evidence of the lawsuit, pointing out that the plaintiff’s requests implicit In it, it requires that the defendant be returned to return the amount with 5% interest until the payment is complete.