Asian imprisonment after being convicted of stealing his wife’s jewelry

An Asian woman edited a communication against her husband, accusing him of stealing her jewelry, which is estimated at about 40 thousand dirhams, and was referred to the Public Prosecution in Dubai, and from there to the misdemeanor court, which punished him for a month and fined him the value of the stolen goods.

After obtaining a final criminal ruling, the wife resorted to the civil judiciary to compensate her for the damage she was exposed to as a result of her husband’s behavior, and the court ruled for her interest in the amount of 50 thousand dinars.

In detail, an Asian woman demanded compensation of 40 thousand dirhams the value of jewelry stolen by her husband, and she also demanded an amount of 11 thousand dirhams to compensate for the literary and moral damage due to the crime he committed against her, and the legal benefit for the amount of the claim of 5%, from the date of the disputed seizure against him on the jewelry belonging to the prosecutor and until the full payment, in addition to all fees and expenses and fees Lawyer.

The prosecutor said in a statement that her husband seized jewelry without her knowledge, and the Court of First Instance punished him for a month, and a fine of an amount equivalent to the value of the jewelry that he seized, and the ruling was supported by the Court of Appeal, and it became permanently at the time of the appeal dates.

She provided a support for her a copy of the criminal ruling, as well as a certificate issued by the Public Prosecution, and a friendly settlement between the two parties was not possible, so the dispute was referred to the lawsuit management office, while the defendant did not represent.

The court submitted to its ruling that according to Article 282 of the material transactions law, “all harm to others is necessary, even if it is not distinguished by ensuring the damage.”

She explained that Article 292 of the same law states that the guarantee is estimated in all cases as much as the victim has suffered from the harm, and what he missed, provided that this is a natural result of the harmful act, and is considered a law of literary harm to infringe on others in his freedom, presentation, honor, reputation, social position or financial consideration.

She pointed out that it is legally decided that the criminal judgment issued on the issue of the criminal case of innocence or condemnation is authentic in which the civil courts are committed in cases in which he had not been separated by a ruling, regarding the crime and its legal description and its lineage to its perpetrator.

Accordingly, if the criminal court is separated by a ruling, the Civil Court must adhere to it in the continuous rights claims, and it is refrained from re -researching it, in order to contact this authenticity to the public order, and so that these provisions are not exposed at any time to review.

The court stated that when it was submitted, and according to the constant, the defendant made a mistake that was the stealing of the plaintiff’s money, and in light of his conviction for a penal ruling, he has been stabbed, the error assigned to him has been proven in a manner that does not accept the argument about him or his re -research, and the civil court remains only to discuss the harm that occurred to the plaintiff as a result of the act and the assessment of the compensation for him.

She added that the constant has that the plaintiff was caused by material damage represented in depriving her of her money, and from using it, and that the constant has the plaintiff with literary damage, represented by what happened to her as a result of what happened to her, and the mighty compensation is estimated at all material and literary damage that was inflicted on her at the amount of 50 thousand dirhams, in addition to the legal interest from the date of the ruling until the completion of the payment.