The life imprisonment of those who are stabbed against them in “Organizing Justice and Terrorism” terrorist “

The Criminal Court of the Federal Supreme Court ruled in its session the day before yesterday to overturn the ruling issued by the State Security Department of the Abu Dhabi Federal Appeal Court – a partial veto – and renewed by the condemnation of 24 accused in the case known in the media as the issue of “Justice and Dignity Organization”, and by punishing them with life imprisonment for crimes of cooperation with the “Justice and Terrorist Dignity” organization, and supplying the “terrorist reform call” organization With money, confiscating the money and things seized in the two crimes.

The Attorney General, Counselor, Dr. Hamad Saif Al Shamsi, was stabbed by the cassation – partly – on the ruling issued by the Appeal Court in the judge’s apartment, “the criminal lawsuit has been expired for these defendants for cooperation crimes with the“ Justice and Dignity terrorist organization ”, and the supply of“ calling for terrorist reform ”with money, for their prior trial in case No. 79 of 2012, the penalty of state security, based on the fact that the contested ruling has been as part The law requires its reversal; The court had to impose the penalty prescribed for the crimes of financing a terrorist organization and cooperating with it as the most severe crime in accordance with the law, with the mandate of the penalty of the previous ruling, and that its judiciary with the expiration of the criminal lawsuit on the two aforementioned charges based on a ruling issued in case No. 79 of 2012 state security crimes that are not in place, because the aforementioned judgment was limited to the conviction of the accused with one crime that is the establishment of the organization The “Call of Reform” stipulated in Article 180/1 of the Penal Code, and the criminals of the terrorist organization and cooperation with it did not address the two imports in Law No. 1 of 2004 regarding the fight against terrorist crimes, which are scheduled to have independent and more severe penalties.

The Federal Supreme Court had seen the appeal submitted by the Attorney General on the ruling and ruled in its meeting the day before yesterday, by vetoing the ruling – partially veto – and the judiciary again condemning 24 accused, and by punishing them with life imprisonment based on the fulfillment of the difference between the two cases in place of the two cases that refrains with the possibility of saying the unity of the cause and the subject in each of them, and it is not valid to be considered one of them with one multiple location; As each of them involves an independent criminal activity allocated for a separate punishment in the legislation, and then the previous ruling in case No. 79 of 2012 does not rise to a state security penalty with an authenticity that prevents the consideration of the accusations of financing and cooperation in the case in the appeal, and when the contested judgment neglects this principle, and decreed the expiration of the criminal case before the contested against them in these two accusations based on the aforementioned judgment, despite the difference in the cause and the issue, Law implementation; Which requires a partial veto in an apartment related to these two accusations, limited to the contesters against them, who were taken by the Attorney General.

It is worth noting that the State Security Department of the Abu Dhabi Federal Appeal Court had convicted in case No. 87 of 2023 known in the media as the issue of “Justice and Dignity terrorist organization” fifty -three accused, from the leaders and members of the terrorist Brotherhood, along with six companies, and ruled for them with penalties that ranged between life and temporary prison and a fine of 20 million dirhams, with the acquittal of one accused, and based on the ruling issued by a security department The state in the Federal Supreme Court, the number of convicts in this case rises to 83 out of 84 accused who were referred to the trial.