المملكة: A period of 60 days and an independent member.. A new organization to object to government fines – urgent

The draft emphasized the principle of “complete neutrality,” as it prohibited the committee chairman or his deputy from being administratively affiliated with the party that initiated the investigation of the violation, while allowing the objector the right to request the dismissal of any member in the event of a conflict of interest or A reason that violates integrity.
The rules gave the complainants a period of 60 days to submit their objections through the “National Platform for Inspection and Oversight” from the date of notification of the violation, obligating the committees to decide on the requests within only 15 days from the completion of the data, with the possibility of a one-time extension for a period of 10 days when necessary.
The regulations stipulate that the failure to issue a decision from the committee within the specified statutory period is considered an “implicit rejection.” To object, which opens the way directly for the complainant to go to the administrative judiciary to preserve his rights without useless waiting.
Suspension of execution of the penalty
The rules gave the committee the power to suspend the implementation of The penalty is temporary if it is proven that its implementation will cause the objector serious harm that cannot be remedied, provided that the violation is not related to cases of fraud or a direct impact on public health.The rules established complete reliance on digital channels, as notification via the electronic platform or official means was considered to produce its regulatory effects immediately after being sent, which ends the era of paper notifications and individual efforts in communicating decisions.
Data confidentiality
The project emphasized the confidentiality of sessions and deliberations, obliging members to disclose in writing any interests that might affect their impartiality, and imposing strict administrative accountability on any member who violates his duties, to ensure the highest levels of integrity in oversight work.The organization permitted committees to seek the assistance of technical experts from outside the entity to provide an opinion on complex issues, with the entity bearing the costs, unless the expert was at the request of the objector, in which case the costs would be at his expense. Private according to specific controls.



