The author of the novel Passing by, screenwriter Amani Al-Tounsi is being sued for the third time
After a final judicial ruling was issued, the author, “Amani Al-Tunisi,” quoted the author “Amani Al-Tunisi.” The scenario of the movie “My Soulmate” From the novel “Passing” To its author, Mohamed El-Sayed Rahma, and to oblige it to pay an amount of 500 thousand pounds in compensation, and to file a lawsuit currently pending before the court to compensate for the unjustified enrichment of the profits achieved by the film and to put his name and the name of his novel in the title of the film, “Amani Al-Tunisi” faces… A new case.
The writer “Muhammad Al-Sayyid Rahma” established There is a lawsuit against her for insult and defamation, against the backdrop of the statement she issued on her personal page on the social networking site “Facebook”. It was reported on websites and newspapers, which contained many inaccuracies and false allegations, as she claimed that the ruling was issued in absentia, and that she was not given the opportunity to defend herself and submit documents proving her right to the scenario. She also claimed that she intends to appeal the ruling, even though the ruling is final and final. It is not subject to appeal, describing the plaintiff with characteristics that would belittle him, as she described him in her statement as an unknown person who tries to exploit celebrities in pursuit of money and fame, ignoring that he is immune from a final judicial ruling. He proves his right.
For his part, “Muhammad Al-Sayyid Rahma” said: Author of the novel Transient, everything issued by the author Amani Al-Tunisi in her statement are nothing but miserable attempts to confuse public opinion and attract sympathy with false allegations that have no basis in truth, through which she seeks to ignore the final rulings of the judiciary and to infringe and attack the original right holders without justification. Right, as she claimed that I took advantage of her absence from the country.
And I filed a lawsuit. Against her, even though during the same period she wrote several reports, she filed a case of insult and defamation against me in 2022, which ended in rejection. She appealed the ruling and lost it again in 2023, that is, at the same time my case was being heard against her. So how was she outside the country, as she claimed in the petition that I submitted? To the court after the issuance of the final ruling by citing that I deceived the court and fabricated an unreal residence for it and that all litigation procedures were sent to it at this fictitious address, even though I had obtained On her address from the photo of her card found in the records and the cases she filed against me, which prompted the court to reject her petition and fine her as well. I am surprised that she mentioned in her statement that she still has an opportunity to veto the ruling, even though everyone knows that vetoing must occur before 60 days have passed from the date of the ruling, or from the date the opponent was notified of it, even if we assume for the sake of argument that she knew of the ruling when she filed the petition on August 6. 2024 More than 60 days have passed since the ruling, and therefore the right of veto has been lost for both parties and the case has ended completely.
As for her claim that the novel was published in 2021. This is something I did not expect to hear at all. The novel was contracted with the publishing house in the year 2019 and was actually published at the book fair in January 2020. The international number number for the novel is fixed as being dated 2019. I attended the fair myself and have many pictures and publications in addition to testimonies from major writers who attended the signing of the novel and signed it. I published reviews of it before the film was released, in addition to producing the novel in audio form, and it surpassed thousands of views on YouTube and within the application before the release date. The film and all of this is proven with documents.
In conclusion, I would like to confirm that there are five distinguished committees, in addition to a technical expert appointed by the court who studied all the details of the case. He read the novel, watched the film, and reviewed all the documents, and his report came proving that Amani Al-Tunisi had violated my novel, and accordingly, the ruling was made after he presented all the evidence to the esteemed body, and I agree with me. All the documents that document all my words.
In his own words, Counselor Amr Gamal, the plaintiff’s lawyer, explained that the deadline for cassation appeals against the rulings, as stipulated in the Code of Procedure, is 60 days starting from the date of the ruling in question. The appeal or from the date of the announcement in the event that the ruling was in absentia, and since Amani Al-Tunisi filed a petition for reconsideration in the month of August 2024, therefore the last date for the cassation appeal is the month of October 2024 and therefore the ruling The ruling issued in Case No. 763 of the year 16 BC is a final ruling that has not been appealed.
As for her attempts to publish papers on her official page that have no basis, and no evidence of their authenticity, this is also strange, as the court was first. With these documents, which she should have at least shown in the petition instead of clinging to the issue of address, which the court was not convinced of.
- For more: Follow Khaleejion 24 Arabic, Khaleejion 24 English, Khaleejion 24 Live, and for social media follow us on Facebook and
