The New York Times: Trump’s decision to stop military aid to Ukraine ascends the dispute between Washington and Kiev

The New York Times shed light on US President Donald Trump’s decision to stop military aid to Ukraine after the dispute intensified in the Oval Office with Ukrainian President Voludumir Zellinski, noting that Trump’s decision is greatly ascended from the dispute between Washington and Kiev, at a critical moment of conflict. Direct precedents in modern American history, forcing Zelinski to agree to a ceasefire with conditions dictated by Trump, or judge Ukraine with greater losses in the battlefield. It also puts the stopping of the United States aid in a direct confrontation with its main allies in NATO /NATO /. Most of the major European countries, led by France, Britain and Germany, have pledged to increase aid to Ukraine in recent days, and sided with Zelinski for his conflict with the Trump administration, but they simply do not have the stocks needed to compensate for the difference in the near term. Ukraine’s security assistance, which provides money that you can use only to buy new military equipment directly from American defense companies and it is not yet clear what Zilinski should do exactly until Trump resumes military aid. Months. The missile artillery is long -range, and the United States supplies Ukraine with spare parts, maintenance and technical support.

& nbsp;

• For more: Follow Khaleejion 24 Arabic, Khaleejion 24 English, Khaleejion 24 Live, and for social media follow us on Facebook and