A woman pays 94,000 dirhams in fake visas and tickets

The Al -Ain Court for Civil, Commercial and Administrative Calls has obligated a man to lead to a woman an amount of 89 thousand and 500 dirhams, which had turned her to him after he deluded her with his ability to extract travel visas for her and her family, booked flight tickets, seized the amount and transferred it to the account of his two sisters.

In the details, a woman filed a lawsuit against a man, in which she demanded that he be obliged to lead her to 94 thousand dirhams with his obligatory fees and expenses, and indicated that the defendant deluded her with his ability to extract a visa for her and her family with the seizure of travel tickets to a European country, and transferred the amount referred to to his account, but he did not accomplish his promise, refrained from returning the amount, and reinforced her A bank account and what is useful for a report and a copy of a misdemeanor matter regarding its communication to the defendant.

For his part, the defendant presented an answer note, at the end of her rejection of the lawsuit, indicating that the plaintiff transferred the amount of 9,500 dirhams from her account to his bank account, and her husband transferred the amount of 80 thousand dirhams, and that was at intervals, pointing to transferring the amounts to his two sisters account as agreed between the plaintiff and his two sisters, and attached pictures of the “WhatsApp” conversations, while the prosecutor denied the statements The plaintiff regarding her agreement with him to transfer the amount to his two sisters, and she adhered to their agreement to be accomplished for her and her family members visas and travel tickets, and she has no evidence to other sums that the defendant did not approve, and restricted her request to obligate him to pay the amount that he acknowledged to receive 89 thousand and 500 dirhams.

The court decided to direct the oath to the plaintiff, so I swore it in the form of “I swear to God Almighty that I agreed with the defendant to complete visas for me and my family members with the reservation of travel tickets, and that I handed him the amount demanded for this agreement, and it was not part of the agreement that this amount transferred to his two sisters, and that the defendant did not commit the visas, nor the book of travel tickets, and that the amount of travel was not paid to me From him, by God, what I say is a martyr.

For its part, the court clarified in the reasons for its ruling that the plaintiff falls upon him the burden of proving the truth of what he claims in this regard, but he was unable to do so, as the plaintiff denied the defendants’ statements, and in the righteousness of the conflict, the court decided to direct the oath of the prosecutor, which I swore that the Muslim amount to the defendant was as a matter of agreeing between them to complete visas and travel tickets for them and to the family of her family, and did not request the amount to him His sister, and then settling in the certainty and conscience of the court, the preoccupation of the defendant is preoccupied with the amount required to approve it to receive him and to say that this amount is owned by the plaintiff without proving what he claims to be a mediator to transfer the money, and the court ruled that the defendant obliges the plaintiff to pay the prosecution an amount of 89 thousand and 500 dirhams, as indicated in the reasons, and obligated the fees and expenses.