The stealing of a mobile phone twice in one day .. from its owner and the thief

He did not congratulate a cleaning worker in one of the major facilities devoted to entertainment and shopping with a modern mobile phone that he surreptitiously seized from one of the pioneers.

In detail, an Asian person stated that he was present with his wife in the Grand Theater area, with a famous attachment for entertainment and shopping, and they were watching one of the musical performances, then he left the ceremony, and they set out wandering at the place.

He stated in the report of the police inference, and the investigations of the Public Prosecution in Dubai that after ten minutes he paid attention to the loss of his modern Samsung phone, and he realized that he had fallen from him in the stage area, so he returned to the same place but he did not find the phone, and he witnessed the cleaning worker in the same spot, so he asked him about the phone, but his last misguidance and told him that he saw a woman picking up the phone and leaving.

The victim continued that he went to the police point in the place and reported the reality, explaining that the phone was in his right front pocket and fell from it when he was sitting on the chair in the big theater..

For its part, the Dubai Police conducted its investigations immediately, by the detective team specialized in the region, and the hygiene worker was suspected, and in his confrontation he confessed that he stole the phone, put it in his clothes bag in the stores of workers, and after the end of his shift heading to the store but he was surprised to steal the phone, and then transferred to the police station and searching his residence, but the phone was not found.

Asked in the investigations of the Public Prosecution, he stated that he was at the head of his work, and he watched the phone under the victim’s chair, so he forgot and put him in his pocket, then he touched him between his personal holdings in the store assigned to them, and when he returned to the place he was surprised by his disappearance.

For its part, the court paved the way for its judiciary to indicate that the lesson in proving the criminal cases is the conviction of the judge and his reassurance of the evidence presented, as long as it had its correct source in the papers, confirming its reassurance to the evidence of evidence in the law In the negligence of its owner, and his concealment in the workers’ store within his personal holdings.

She pointed out that the foregoing is established in the certainty of the court that the accused is convicted of seizing the intention of ownership on lost money is a mobile phone, but it sees from the circumstances and circumstances of the law.