Beijing’s warnings to Tokyo about “rearmament” ignite the influence race in East Asia

During the Munich Security Conference, which was held last week, the attention of participants and observers was focused on the positions of the major powers, especially the statements made by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi. In response to a question directed to him during the conference, he issued a warning to Japan about what he described as the “ghosts of militarization,” in a clear reference to Chinese fears about the possibility of Tokyo returning to rearmament policies in a way that goes beyond its defense framework.

From a historical perspective, Beijing’s sensitivity seems understandable, as China was one of the most affected by the wars that Japan fought during the 20th century, when Tokyo adopted an expansionist imperialist approach that led to the occupation of vast territories in Asia. However, the political and cultural reality of Japan today is radically different from what it was in the 1930s. Contemporary Japan adopts a peaceful approach firmly established in its constitution and political practices, and at no recent stage has it shown a desire to wage wars against any country. But Yi’s warnings do not seem to be linked only to the legacy of the historical past, but rather are more closely related to current issues that preoccupy decision-makers in Beijing, especially with regard to China’s security and its vital space in East Asia, especially the vital trade lanes that pass through the region. China views any regional movement that might be interpreted as an attempt to restrict its influence or oppose it as a direct threat to its national security.

Backfire

Although the Chinese minister’s tone carried within it a clear message of deterrence directed at Tokyo, such statements may backfire. Instead of deterring Japan, they may push it to strengthen its cooperation with its main ally, the United States, and with its partners in East Asia, leading to greater military coordination and strengthening collective defense capabilities in the region.

Japan still defines itself as a peaceful country, and despite its recent efforts to enhance its defense capabilities, these steps are presented internally and externally as precautionary measures not aimed at aggression. In this context, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi emphasized in her statements that her government’s interest is focused on the security of the region as a whole, and not on pursuing expansionist policies.

pressure

From a more realistic angle, Wang Yi’s statements can be understood as an attempt to pressure Japan and dissuade it from opposing Chinese policies in East Asia, a region that Beijing considers to be of great strategic importance, especially with regard to sea lanes, shipping lines and international trade. However, betting on a policy of intimidation may not have guaranteed results. Recent political developments in Japan have shown that such pressures have not weakened the trend calling for strengthening defense capabilities, but rather coincided with the victory of the Liberal Democratic Party, led by Takaichi, with a large majority in the recent elections.

While assertive Chinese diplomacy has shown an ability to influence some smaller countries in the Indo-Pacific region, it has not succeeded in bringing about a similar shift in the Japanese position. Countries such as Vietnam and the Philippines have faced challenges in standing up to China within their exclusive economic zones. However, Japan, by virtue of its political and economic weight and its alliances, appears to be in a different position and more capable of maneuvering.

America’s interest

As for the United States, its interest in East Asia is not limited to the geopolitical dimension, but rather extends to very important economic and technical considerations, as the American economy depends to a large extent on Taiwan, which is a global center for the production of advanced electronic chips used in vital industries that include military equipment, electric cars, and advanced technologies.

Although the administration of US President Donald Trump announced its efforts to expand the production of these chips within the United States, achieving self-sufficiency in this field requires several years before local production fully covers American needs.

During this transitional period, Washington is keen to ensure that Taiwan remains outside the sphere of Chinese control, as this is an essential part of its strategy in the region. Hence the importance of American alliances in East Asia, as the presence of a network of security partnerships makes it difficult for China to impose complete hegemony over the region.

In addition, the United States has a strategic interest in maintaining strong influence in East Asia. Reneging on commitments to allies there may be interpreted in other regions of the world as an indicator of weakness or hesitation, which may encourage other international powers to test the limits of American deterrence, which may lead to increasing tensions and conflicts rather than containing them.

Pivotal role

In this context, if Japan continues to strengthen its defense capabilities, it can play a pivotal role in supporting smaller countries in the region and confronting any potential threat. The growth of Japanese power also allows the United States to distribute defense burdens more evenly, which is extremely important in light of its military commitments in multiple regions around the world.

Takaichi seeks to raise military spending and make constitutional amendments that would allow the Japanese Self-Defense Forces to play a more active role in regional politics, including the possibility of deploying forces to protect smaller countries when needed.

In return, the United States may find it appropriate to strengthen its defense cooperation with Tokyo, including increasing sales of military equipment to the Japanese Self-Defense Forces, to ensure Japan’s readiness to play a broader and more influential role in the regional security equation. About “The Daily Signal”

---

conflict

The Asian statements made during the Munich Security Conference were not just a passing diplomatic exchange, but rather reflect a deeper struggle over influence and security arrangements in East Asia, where deterrence calculations, alliances, and economic interests intersect in an international scene characterized by increasing complexity and competition.

. The Chinese warnings can be understood as an attempt to pressure Japan and dissuade it from opposing Beijing’s policies in East Asia.

. The United States’ interest in East Asia is not limited to the geopolitical dimension, but extends to very important economic and technical considerations.