An employee refuses to pay 299 thousand dirhams, flight reservations and hotels for her and her family

Amr Bayoumi – Abu Dhabi
The Abu Dhabi Family and Civil and Administrative Courts, obliging a woman to perform her colleague in the work of an amount of 299 thousand and 722 dirhams, the value of airline ticket reservations on business class, and hotels in two states that the prosecutor carried out in favor of the defendant and her family, but she refused to pay.

In the details, a man filed a lawsuit against an employee of a colleague at the work, in which he requested that the defendant be obligated to pay him an amount of 299 thousand and 722 dirhams, with the delay interest on the origin of the amount by 9 % annually from the date of payment of the bills to be paid to complete payment, while obliging them to fees, expenses and law fees, indicating that the defendant was his colleague at work and by virtue of his relationship with airlines and tourism From him reserving flight tickets and reserving hotels for them and her family to travel on a tourist trip, provided that she pays their value later and accordingly a request from a tourism company to make these reservations from tickets and hotels with the payment of payment until the sums were received from the defendant, but the defendant traveled and returned and did not pay the value of the tickets and reservations of hotel worth 333 thousand and 250 dirhams, which forced him to pay The sums required after obtaining a discount from the ticket exporting company and reservations.

A supporter of his lawsuit presented an account, a ticket bills and reservations in the name of the defendant issued by a ticket and reservations company, and phone messages about requesting reservations and travel tickets in the name of the defendant, and bonds of arrests from the plaintiff, while the defendant submitted an answer note at the end of her rejection of the lawsuit with the plaintiff obliging fees, expenses and law fiscles.

During the interrogation session, the prosecutor decided before the supervising judge that by virtue of his work in the same place of the defendant’s work and by virtue of his relationship with tourist companies, the defendant asked him to book tickets for her and her family on the degree The reservations, and decided that he had a witness who wanted to listen to the court for his testimony.

While the defendant decided, during her interrogation from the supervising judge, that the claimant speech is not true, as she and during her work with him in the same company in the year 2022, the prosecutor was responsible for tickets and offered them tickets and travel reservations to two states as a gift, so she accepted her and traveled with her family according to those tickets and reservations, and this is the truth of the incident and the evidence for her statements that he did not demand these amounts except in the year 2024.

While the witness confirmed after her legal oath, “She works for a company for a flying and hotels tickets and they were dealing with the plaintiff in an official capacity by providing tickets and reservations for their employees. One day, she was asked to provide reservations and tickets for an employee and her children to go to two states, and the consequence of a bill of approximately 290 thousand dirhams and then we took his demands where he was late in paying the amount and then discovered that we discovered that This request is personal and not affiliated with the government agency, which caused us problems with the company’s administration and asked us to pay or obligate the customer to pay. It is approximately 30%, and there are receipts. ”

For its part, the court clarified in the reasons for its ruling, that after it saw in the documents and the phone messages submitted by the plaintiff, which were not disbelieved by the defendant with the preoccupation of the defendant in the aforementioned amount, as well as the testimony of the witness and the testimony that the plaintiff booked tickets and hotel reservations in the name of the defendant, which the court considers a presumption of the validity of what the prosecutor claims, and then the court extracts the validity of the plaintiff’s debt The demands, and the court ruled that the defendant compel the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of 299 thousand and 722 dirhams, and to compel the defendant to fees, fees and law fees.