12 thousand dirhams, one of the “Lamborghini” is a rented from Dubai

One of the car rental companies in Dubai was surprised by a notice from the Abu Dhabi Police stating that a violation of one of its luxury cars was sentenced to 2000 dirhams and 80 days of reservation, to reach the total cost of 12 thousand dirhams, and when the car’s tenant asked to pay the fine due from that, it took the initiative to sue themselves before the Civil Court in Dubai, which obliged them to pay the value of the violation.

In detail, a car rental company filed a lawsuit in which it demanded two people to pay the amount of 12 thousand and 200 dirhams, a traffic violation that he committed in one of its vehicles, the Lamborghini Harikan Spider.

She said in a statement that she claimed that, based on a contract between them, the defendant rented the car referred to for only one day for 2500 dirhams, and in the meantime a violation recorded by the Abu Dhabi police to exceed the extra speed of 2000 dirhams, in addition to a complementary punishment represented in reserving the car for 80 days or paying the reservation allowance 10 thousand dirhams.

She added that she had to pay the amounts of violations and the reservation allowance in addition to the fees and expenses at 12 thousand and 200 dirhams, and then demanded the tenants to the amount, but they were upset, pointing out that she submitted to the friendly settlement center for disputes in an attempt to resolve the matter to negotiate, but to no avail.

She provided a support for her a copy of the car rental contract, a copy of the violations and the receipt of the reservation allowance to the Abu Dhabi Police, while the two defendants did not appear before the court despite their announcement of the lawsuit.

After hearing the lawsuit, the court clarified in the reasons for its ruling that according to the Civil Transactions Law, the contract obligations are the duty to fulfill its limbs, and the evidence of evidence stipulates that the customary editor is considered to be issued by those who signed it and an argument against it, unless it explicitly denies what is attributed to it in terms of line, signature, seal or fingerprint.

She pointed out that the constant of the court from reading the lease contract is the support of the lawsuit that it is anchor with a signature of the defendant, and the last two did not attend to pay the lawsuit with any payment or defense, and they did not challenge their signature of the contract on the contract with any stab Legal interest at 5% from the date of filing the lawsuit and until complete payment.