Reports

Trump procedures are exposed to the United States to lose its hegemony in science and research

With the withdrawal of the welcoming rug from promising researchers from all over the world, the United States has become subject to the risk of losing its long -term hegemony in the field of science.

Bangalore was in India, for decades, an incubator for scientific talents, and she continued to send new doctoral degrees to all parts of the world to conduct pioneering research, and every year many of them were looking for US laboratories.

“These are our students and we want them to be creative,” says a professor at the National Center for Biological Sciences in Bengalor, said:

American superiority

With the Trump administration’s refusal to grant visas to foreign students and expel some of them, and reduce spending on scientific research, scientists in the United States are increasing, and they warn that the global superiority that the United States enjoyed long in the fields of health, neighborhoods, physical sciences, and other areas, may be about to disappear.

“If things continue in this way, the American flag will collapse,” says David W. HoG, who works closely with astronomers and other experts around the world.

Trump procedures

There has been a decrease in research spending, and there are steps to limit the presence of foreign students by the Trump administration at an amazing pace, and the administration went to the point of preventing any international students from joining Harvard University, and research grants have been completed or stopped with a value of more than three billion dollars.

At Johns Hopkins University, the stronghold of scientific research, officials announced the demobilization of more than 2000 people after losing $ 800 million in government scholarships, and an analysis conducted by the New York Times showed that the National Science Corporation, which is the most prominent global financing agency in the field of physical sciences, provided funds for new grants at least since 1990.

The suffering of scientific research

Not only does the American scientific community lose its influence or prestige, as the professor of neighborhoods and physics in Germany, Dirk Brockman, warns of much broader repercussions.

He says that accepting the risk and the inspiration that seems crazy and inherent in American positions, contributes to creating an unparalleled research environment anywhere, and the result was decades of innovation, economic growth and military progress.

“There is a very deep thing in culture that makes this experience very distinctive, it is more like a magic component,” added Professor Brockmann, who previously taught at North Western University.

Scientists believe that some international talents that have long contributed to advancing the American research may settle elsewhere, and other governments, from France to Australia, began to publicly get close to American scientists.

Given the US leadership in this field for a long time, there is deep concern that scientific research will suffer globally.

“In several areas, the United States is the primary partner undoubtedly,” says Wim Limms, director of the Uptimum Research Center in Germany, and a professor at Hamburg University, says Limnz, a 34 -year -old American citizen in the United States, says that in areas such as medical research and climate control, the rest of the world will have difficulty in compensating for the loss of US leadership in this field.

Flag and infinite borders

In 1945, the Presidential Scientific Adviser, Vanifar Bush, issued a historical plan for science in the United States after the Second World War, and this plan was known as “infinite science and borders”, and among his arguments was that the country would benefit more by sharing information, including bringing in foreign scientists even if they left one day, instead of trying to protect the discoveries that will be discovered in other places anyway.

The International Technology Adviser at the White House during the era of President Joe Biden, Cole Donovan, stressed that the plan contributed to strengthening the scientific dominance of the United States after the war, and added: “A large part of the United States’s strength and influence stems from our scientific and technological excellence.”

Professor Brockman, who studies the complex systems at Dresden University of Technology, was planning to return to North Western University to give a major lecture in June, and this lecture was scheduled to be part of his family trip to the United States, as his children previously lived in Ivanston – Illinois, where he taught at the university from 2008 to 2013, but he canceled the lecture after it issued a ministry after it issued a ministry. The Foreign Ministry is new to travel to the United States after German tourists were detained on the American border, and he said this warning was “a sign of me, because I do not feel safe.” On the New York Times


International alternative to the United States

The American administration prevented the acceptance of any foreign student in Harvard. Reuters

The International Technology Adviser at the White House during the era of President Joe Biden, Cole Donovan, believes that it is too early if Europe, for example, or China, is able to take over an international leadership role in the field of science, while the professor at the National Center for Biological Sciences in Bangalore, Raj Ladir, sees that Europe has so far blocked some gaps in employing graduates, and said: “Austria has become a promising destination for many of our students.”

In Bangalore in India, a graduate student awaiting discussion of her doctorate in the field of cells and cancer signals that it is widely believed in India that American laboratories will not employ a large number of international students this year.

The student, who asked not to be named, added, because she is still planning to apply for jobs in the United States and does not want to harm her opportunities, that this prompted many of her colleagues to search for jobs in other places, and pointed out that the American scientific community has great respect and appreciation abroad for a long time, and that “it is sad to see this hero retraces his position,” she said.

Related Articles

Back to top button