Egypt Pharmacists Club rejects the government amendments to the old rental law
Egypt Pharmacists Club, headed by Dr. Mohamed Esmat, rejected the proposed amendments from the government regarding the old rental law.
Dr. said. Mohamed Esmat, head of the Egypt Pharmacists Club, and member of the Executive Office of the Arab Pharmacists Union, that in light of the ongoing legislative trends to amend the old rental law, and despite the economic vision of the proposed project aimed at editing the relationship between the owner and the tenant, the application of these amendments blindly to all commercial units, including pharmacies, represents a real danger to the public health sector in Egypt, and a direct threat to stability Pharmacies and medicine service in Egypt, and explicitly contradicts the spirit of the constitution and the principles of social justice.
& nbsp;
Dr. Muhammad Esmat, that pharmacies are not a regular commercial shop, but rather are health facilities licensed under the law of practicing the pharmacy profession No. 127 of 1955, and are subject to strict controls by the Egyptian Ministry of Health and the Egyptian Drug Authority, and is legally obligated to have a distance of no less than 100 meters between each pharmacy and another according to Ministerial Resolution No. 189 of 1976, which prevents it easily or finding an alternative in the event of a judgment. By evacuating it.
& nbsp;
Dr. Mohamed Esmat that the application of these amendments to pharmacies is an explicit violation of the following constitutional articles: Article (18) of the Egyptian Constitution, which ensures the state providing health care services to all citizens, and it is not permissible to detract from any acquired health right, and Article (35) that provides for the protection of private property, and here the property does not mean the real estate, but also includes the entity of the licensed establishment, and Article (27) that confirms the state’s commitment to achieving social justice and economic development Balanced, which contradicts the displacement of pharmacies that have been working for decades.
& nbsp; It is permissible to end the rental relationship if this results in harm to the public interest, including health service providing facilities. The most expensive areas, and a sharp deficiency in covering the poor and marginalized areas with the basic pharmaceutical service.
& nbsp; Saying: & quot; Egypt’s pharmacists did not reject the idea of developing the rental relationship, but rather demanding the implementation of the obligatory discrimination between the activities, and that all that is related to the health service, in the forefront of which are pharmacies, until the development of practical alternatives that guarantee their continuation without harm & quot;.
& nbsp; Medical professions, their vital role in serving the community, and to open a comprehensive community dialogue that includes representatives of professional unions directly affected, and highlighting the human and social dimension to harm the pharmacist’s heirs from these amendments, especially since many inherited pharmacies represent the only source of income and living for families The whole.
& nbsp; His Article (30) on the permissibility of continuing to operate the pharmacy after the death of its owner by a director of a manager, and with the approval of the ministry, which guarantees the heirs to a legitimate right to continue the activity without threatening to evacuate or expulsion.
& nbsp; The whole of its constitutional right to work and legitimate gain, in violation of Article (12) of the Constitution that obliges the state to protect irregular employment, families that do not have an alternative, and the rule of the Supreme Constitutional Court issued in November 14, and ruled to increase the rental value of housing units, the fair balanced increase and did not touched permanently to the commercial units, knowing that the Supreme Constitutional Court previously in November ۲۰۰۲ Legal for the tenant for housing for one generation .. As has already been issued the ruling of the Supreme Constitutional Court in April ۲۰۰۲ to achieve an extension of the shops and the monthly rental value of the commercial is increased by Law No. 6/1997.
& nbsp;
- For more: Follow Khaleejion 24 Arabic, Khaleejion 24 English, Khaleejion 24 Live, and for social media follow us on Facebook and Related
