Trump drags America to tyranny … and Nigel Faraj will do the proverb in Britain

The warnings in the United States have become the aspirations of the US President, Donald Trump, aimed at absolute powers, which were previously rejected, as exaggerated and “hysterical”, now it seems insufficient, as Trump moves quickly exceeding everything that everyone imagines, to weaken the institutional controls imposed on his authority, whether in courts, universities, civil service or journalism, and now began to work on silence His critics, it seems that he has succeeded in banning large sectors of the opposition.

Last week, the ABC television network, owned by Disney, was forced to stop the “Jimmy Kimmel Live” program, after comments made by the presenter of the killing of the right -wing activist, Charlie Kirk.

In fact, Kimmel was not criticized by activist Kerk in itself, a work that is now a disbelief in the United States, but rather criticized the reaction of the Republican Congress members to the killing of Kerk, especially their endeavor to “achieve political gains from it.”

This was sufficient to pay the chairman of the Federal Communications Committee, Brendan Car, appointed by Trump, the body that grants or canceled broadcast licenses, to appear enthusiastically, saying: “We can do this in an easy or difficult way.” This threat succeeded and Kimmel has become outside the program.

Of course, this is not the only time, as Trump tries to intimidate the largest American newspapers, as he filed a case demanding compensation of $ 15 billion in the New York Times, accusing the newspaper of publishing a false and distorted message, and this newspaper has adequate resources to resist, but the smaller American newspapers will certainly understand the message, and no one can blame these newspapers if he refrains from criticizing For Trump, just because she does not have enough money to enter into judicial conflicts against the president.

But the Trump administration’s attack is not limited to the media only, as Kirk’s killing was an opportunity for her to suppress the opposition as well, and the promise made by one of Trump’s assistants, Stephen Miller, this week, on the “Bodcast Charlie Kerk”, to fight all left -wing organizations that issue “messages aimed at inciting violence”, and it is not unlikely that Miller will know this category with a wide definition, so Most of Trump’s opponents include, and if this seems worrying, they remember that even before the assassination of Kirk, Miller was describing the Democratic Party as a “local extremist organization”.

It is true that in the United Kingdom we are far from the current situation in the United States, but last week, between 110,000 and 150,000 Britons came out to the streets of London, wearing the well -known right -wing incitement, Tommy Robinson.

It is worth emphasizing that this was not a reform march or a province that Robinson was kidnapped, but this was his effectiveness, and the British realize who is Robinson and what he represents, yet about 150,000 of them crawled behind him, and they did not discourage them from that who described him as the extreme right -wing protest, not even the racial discourse that emanated from the platform.

Britain is distinguished by the history of admiration in limiting the extreme right to the margin, and ensuring that it is not shown, so far, so what happened last Saturday should be understood as a turning point for the worst, and not the cause is one specific discourse.

The American businessman, Elon Musk, said through the video to the public: “Violence is coming to you, either you face it or you will die.” He added that “the workers’ government, which is democratically elected a year ago, must solve itself.”

However, the prime minister was not rushed to condemn this blatant interference in our policy, and indeed, the government head was not issued by any statements in this regard, until the questions of the journalists and the demands of the deputies pushed him the next day, and we often blame the guilty of exaggeration in the reaction, but at a moment like this, the lack of reaction is the greatest sin.

Opinion polls show a very tragic fact, as one of the national and popular parties is on the way to overcoming the Labor and Conservative Party in the upcoming elections, and it is likely that it will form the next government, and perhaps

The Chairman of the Reform Party, Nigel Faraj, is not a supporter of Tommy Robinson, but he is the most prominent supporter of Trump in Britain, as he does not condemn the current American rush towards tyranny, but stands beside him, and if we want to prevent Farraj from doing Britain what Trump is doing in the United States, we have to stop his party.

The first step in this field is to get rid of the essence of Varage’s claim, which is that he speaks in the name of the British people, and that his views reflect the views of the “proper logic” of the silent majority, but this is not true.

He was the main defender of the United Kingdom’s secession from the European Union “Brexit”, a decision that was a catastrophe, as 31% of the British say it was a correct step, but in fact 56% preferred to return to the European Union, and want to re -join the European Union, but Farraj is on the wrong party of that number.

He promoted strongly to withdraw from the European Union Convention on Human Rights, and if you read the right -wing newspapers, you will assume that this is the opinion of the majority, and this is a mistake, as support for staying in the European Human Rights Convention is approximately 60%, and it has actually increased with the increase in the debate on the subject, and for this, Varage is out of the consensus of the British people.

But it is certain that he is consistent with public opinion in the issue that he devoted to himself, which is immigration, in the end that the Labor Party has built its entire political strategy on this assumption, yet the numbers tell a different story, while 81% of the Islah Party’s voters believe that immigrants have eliminated British culture, only 31% of the British generally believe this, and if you ask about the impact of immigrants on the economy, you will get A similar image, “reform” is what lacks realism.

You can continue this approach, and the Labor Party must do so, indicating that Faraj speaks on behalf of the marginalized groups, not moderation.

The British also do not support the surrender of Afghan refugees to the “Taliban” movement, as Faraj calls, and do not agree that Britain becomes like North Korea, and they do not consider someone sitting in Washington and talking to the British remote Nigel Faraj.

The opponents of the Reform Party must reveal all these gaps between Faraj and the voters, so that it is re -photographed as a marginal figure, but this cannot be the task of the liberal workers or democrats alone, as any party claims to appreciate the importance of democracy, including what remains of the Conservative Party, and sees how national populism quickly leads to tyranny, he must make the same effort and quickly, all of us do so, while the Americans learn At their expense, you cannot delay, otherwise the freedoms that you thought would last forever may fade in the blink of an eye. *Jonathan Friedland Writer in “The Guardian” On the “Guardian”

• The opponents of the Islah party must reveal the gaps between Faraj and the voters, in order to be photographed as a marginal figure.

Trump is trying to intimidate the largest American newspapers, raising a case demanding compensation of $ 15 billion in the New York Times.