Counselor Khafaji: In a study of the secret history of organizing the use of religion to demolish the state

On the twelfth anniversary of the June 30, 2013 revolution, we show an important recent study that deals with the historical, political and religious dimension of the Muslim Brotherhood since its foundation in 1928 by Hassan Al -Banna, analyzing the methods that the group used to adapt religion for political purposes, and crimes committed locally and globally in the name of the Islamic project, and evaluating its impact on societies and states. The study prepared the Egyptian jurist, the judge, Dr. Mohamed Abdel -Wahab Khafaji, Vice -President of the State Council known for its national research entitled: (The Brotherhood: The Secret History of the Organization of the Use of Religion to Demolish the State, the crimes of the organization from the formation until today an analytical study in the roots, the ideology of violence, the structure of the organization, the transient financing of borders, global penetration and potential visions)

and we address in the fourth part of this important study the following. :

Sayyid Qutb, a pivotal ideological perspective in the march of the terrorist Brotherhood & nbsp;

Dr. Muhammad Khafagy says & quot; If we want & nbsp; About Sayyid Qutb, he was born in 1906 in Egypt, and he was a writer, thinker and literary critics before he turned into a prominent Islamic and political preacher. He joined the Muslim Brotherhood in the mid -fifties, and became one of its most prominent theorists until his arrest in 1954, then his execution in 1966. It is a major reference for group ideology. & Quot;

adds & quot; Sayyid Qutb is a central figure to understand the Brotherhood, as he presented a strict religious political vision aimed at full control of the state and society by imposing divine governance. Perhaps the thought of Qutb is the main reason behind the violent ideological and political transformation that the group has witnessed in recent decades. The pole began his work in literary criticism, but he was severely affected by poverty and injustice in Egypt, especially after his experience in the United States, where he saw a gap between Western civilization and the values ​​of Islam. The vision of Islam has been adopted not just an individual religion, but a comprehensive system that includes politics, economics, meeting, and culture. & Quot;

and emphasizes & quot; I have an opinion that the essence of the thought of Qutb is the theory of absolute rule, and its meaning has & nbsp; That God alone is the real ruler & laquo; the rule of God alone & raquo; what means that any political system is not based on Islamic law, it is invalid and infidel. Hence, it is not permissible for Muslims & ndash; In the doctrine of Sayyid Qutb – to obey the systems & laquo; Or & laquo; pre -Islamic & raquo; Which refuses to implement the rule of God. There is no doubt that this concept is used to justify the rejection of existing systems, even if they are elected, and justify the exit on them. Contemporary ignorance, jihad and atonement and its impact on the Brotherhood

Dr. Muhammad Khafagy states & quot; The pole of contemporary society in Islam was numbered as in the state of & laquo, even if its inhabitants are Muslims. And ignorance is not only an apparent disbelief, but a social, cultural and political situation that rejects the rule of God. This description makes the believer’s duty & laquo; jihad & raquo; To change the pre -Islamic society to a real Islamic society. & Quot;

indicates & quot; And about & nbsp; Jihad in the thought of Qutb & nbsp; Not only resistance, but the establishment of an Islamic state. Jihad at a pole is not limited to military fighting only, but is an intellectual, political and social jihad. Among its most important results is the necessity of dropping pre -Islamic regimes and establishing a country that completely applies the law, without leniency. He rejected any compromise or bargaining solutions with the existing system. & Quot;

adds & quot; As for & nbsp; Takfir, & nbsp; A pole separation between & laquo; believers & raquo; And & laquo; infidels & raquo; And atone for the sectors that do not apply the law of God and do not recognize the divine governance. This is a cradle of takfiri discourse that justifies violence against the regimes and individuals who classify them in the category & laquo; ignorance & raquo; Or & laquo; There is no doubt that we have the effect of this on some extremist organizations that adopted the extremist Qutb approach. A deep pole on the Brotherhood’s generations, where the intellectual basis of the group’s transformation from a social reform movement to a political movement of totalitarian ideology was formed. However, the adoption of this approach led to divisions within the group between those who adopted the escalation line, and among those who preferred moderate political action, and they are a rare few, and it soon split an individual. Many Islamic scholars have criticized this approach as a wrong transformation of Islamic discourse towards violence and atonement, unlike the moderation that Islam calls for. & Quot;

& nbsp;

• For more: Follow Khaleejion 24 Arabic, Khaleejion 24 English, Khaleejion 24 Live, and for social media follow us on Facebook and Related